Kainz A(1,3), Goliasch, G(2), Wiesbauer F(2), Binder T(2), Maurer G(2), Nesser H-J(4), Mascherbauer R(4), Ebner C(4), Kramar R(5), Wilflingseder J(1), Oberbauer R(1,3,5).
1- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
2- Deparment of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3- Department of Nephrology, KH Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
4- Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Linz, Austria
// Tables
// Figures
Webtable 1:
Comparing demographics between study cohort and subjects without echocardiographic evaluation. Values represent count (percentage), mean (standard deviation) or median (25th, 75th percentile).
View PDF
Webfigure 1:
(a) Kaplan-Meier plot for mortality stratified by LA2D median and censored graft loss. (b) Kaplan-Meier plot of mortality stratified by LA2D median (53 mm). In this plot also patients who died in the first year are included.
View PDF
Webtable 2:
Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of echo parameters and demographic parameters in univariate models.
View PDF
Webfigure 2:
Log hazard ratio for left atrial diameter as a spline curve in the model for mortality. There is no non-linearity evident. Therefore we used the linear model for further evaluation.
View PDF
Webtable 3:
Multivariate Cox model with year of transplantation added, which was not included by the purposeful selection algorithm.
View PDF
Webtable 4:
Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for mortality in a cause specific model and a competing risk model (Fine and Gray model). In these analyses only cardiac death was counted as event.
View PDF